
the pirate bay conspiracy, shared CC by narghee-la
A crony sent me notice of this talk happening next week here at UBC:
Adrian Johns: “The Intellectual Property Defense Industry and the Crisis of Information”
October 20, 2011 – 5:00pm; Dodson Room (302) I. K. Barber Learning Centre
With the rise of the information economy has come the development of an industry devoted to policing that economy. This industry is composed of both public institutions like the United States’ FBI and ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and private companies marketing protective and detective services. Its primary focus is the major structuring element of the information world: intellectual property. It seeks to uphold copyrights, patents, and trademarks where they exist, and to extend their scope to new domains where they do not. It may therefore be called the Intellectual Property Defense Industry. Although it is still largely unknown to the public, its history and conduct – I shall argue – have substantially shaped many of the everyday practices that constitute our culture of information. Indeed, if, as many believe, that culture is facing a crisis, then it is a crisis sparked by the very institutions intended to preserve it.

banksy-rat-pirate shared CC by Jym Dyer
Ashamed to admit I had not read the work of Adrian Johns before today. But the prospect of seeing this talk next week was enough to send me scurrying like a rat to the UBC Law Library to secure a copy of his latest book without paying for it. Working at a university, and the access to an academic library system that comes with it, has its privileges. I had not realized what a privilege this was, nor the penalties for violating its exclusivity, until recently. I digress…
I can only pray that I am safe within the cozy confines of Canadian “fair dealing” when I quote a couple paragraphs from the blurb for Piracy:
Piracy explores the intellectual property wars from the advent of print culture in the fifteenth century to the reign of the Internet in the twenty-first. Written with a historian’s flair for narrative and sparkling detail, the book swarms throughout with characters of genius, principle, cunning, and outright criminal intent: in the wars over piracy, it is the victims—from Charles Dickens to Bob Dylan—who have always been the best known, but the principal players—the pirates themselves—have long languished in obscurity, and it is their stories especially that Johns brings to life in these vivid pages.
Brimming with broader implications for today’s debates over open access, fair use, free culture, and the like, Johns’s book ultimately argues that piracy has always stood at the center of our attempts to reconcile creativity and commerce—and that piracy has been an engine of social, technological, and intellectual innovations as often as it has been their adversary. From Cervantes to Sonny Bono, from Maria Callas to Microsoft, from Grub Street to Google, no chapter in the story of piracy evades Johns’s graceful analysis in what will be the definitive history of the subject for years to come.
Boy howdy! That looks like dang fine readin’! [I hope that qualifies as “criticism and/or review”, not sure how much more I can offer before I read the book.]
I had intended to get a start on Piracy while commuting to the bar home, but demons of digital serendipity had other plans for me. The following podcast, from Benjamen Walker happened to be at the top of my rotation:
October 3, 2011: PIRATES
The ancients said that the Pirate was the enemy of all mankind. Mzwakhe Mbuli wants to Shoot the Pirate, and Olga Sezneva says Russia is doing its best (in its own way) to solve the problem as well. We hear from a real Somali Pirate who will be in an upcoming documentary made by David Cálek. Adrian Johns tells us about the birth of the Pirate listener and the death of Pirate Radio. PLUS Tim Kreider on Errol Flynn!
I came for the Adrian Johns, I stayed for the Somali Pirates! Bonus points for any commenters who care to draw out connections between a Russian regime that fines Deep Purple for playing its own songs (I’d add a joke about ‘musical justice’, but I like Deep Purple), and the publishing system that is propped up by freedom-loving western academics everywhere. (Almost everywhere.) WARNING: the use of the word “mafia” in any context herein will be deemed slanderous and dangerous to my kneecaps forthwith, and banished accordingly.
Hat-tip to Alec Dawson for letting me know about Dr. Johns’ talk next week. I feel compelled to add that I am one of the wooden-headed idealist cronies pilloried in this post of his. Which reminds me that a revision of my initial impressions of Occupy Wall Street is overdue… And that I really need to bash out my conflicted thoughts on the utility of public protest in general…. Try to contain your anticipation.
Anticipation contained, but barely. I am curious for your thoughts.
My own thoughts peg me apparently as a 20th century man. But I’m increasingly OK with that. Too much meta for my taste, but I love the amount of press coverage and the scale. I’ll take it in the hopes that the as it expands to something useful and less self-involved.
Stranger things have happened.
Hey Mike. I read your post on the meta-movement just before I wrote this… Interesting stuff, as ever.
I don’t pretend to any deep understanding of what is happening, or its significance. But I am not so sure of the “meta-ness” thing… And I fear that description just reinforces that dismissive “but what are their demands?” response. It strikes me as a vaguely sympathetic left-liberal restatement of the Fox News complaint.
I might be wrong. I’m not reading the missives, and I don’t have cable TV news at home. You may be seeing things that I am not. But from what I see, the message is not so mysterious — they are pissed off about economic injustice and corruption, and they have lost faith in democratic institutions to respond. They may not have designated spokesperson, a media strategy, or a soundbite of the day… but I find it easer to understand them than say, Barack Obama or Eric Holder explaining why we musn’t prosecute cases against torturers or Wall Street criminals.
I do wonder if there is any power left in street protest, or if it merely reinforces the status of the status quo. Not that I have any better ideas at this point.
Man, I want to hear that talk. But there’s a book, which might be nearly as good. Thanks Brian for waving both the former and the latter in my direction.
Let me know if you want to borrow my copy of “Piracy,” it is very good. It really flushes out the sordid history of copyright and the role that “piracy” has had in helping knowledge and culture flourish.
Hi guys. Started Johns’ Piracy yesterday, and yeah it is great. Scott, I think you recommended it before, wish I had picked up on it sooner.
Nature of the Book is amazing, and vast.