Beyond Content: Open Ed Party in Van Rock City

One of the most fun, satisfying and memorable experiences of my life was co-organizing the Open Education Conference here in Vancouver back in 2009. So it’s a thrill to be working with so many of the same people again for another kick at it this fall, October 16-18, pushing the theme Beyond Content.

As open education expands out we’ve come to see our work as part of a broader context of openness – open data, open access, open government, open source, to name a few. At Open Education 2012 we’re looking to connect our thinking and build synergies with these parallel movements.

We’ve got the same downtown venue, a great team of hosts (thanks to BCcampus for stepping up as primary hosts), a fantastic set of keynotes (Carolina Rossini, John Willinsky, Gardner Campbell). We are going to try to keep the elements that worked in 2009, and add some programming and social wrinkles that we hope will result in an amazing experience. One piece I am excited about is a dinner cruise through the waters around Vancouver’s Pacific Ocean coastline – although plans are still hazy, expect a participatory rock jam for the ages on our custom-fitted highly-amplified open ed love boat.

I’m also pleased that we have a number of innovative formats and approaches for sessions. In addition to standard presentations, I invite you consider hosting an interview or a debate, or submit your work for the Open Pitch Fest or Remixathon slots. Deadline for presentation proposals is May 25th.

Did I mention that early-bird tickets are only $200 CDN? That includes a spot on the cruise. Expensive conferences suck! This conference will sell out, don’t miss out on this baby!

Posted in Abject | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dreamin’ dream dream dream

The quiet in this space has not been due to a lack of notable activity in my life. Sadly, I don’t think I can share much of it right now. But I bet Abject readers — the true, the bold, the weak and the chatty — will discern where I am at by these two all-too-apt video choices:

Believe me, I am working hard to get some clarity on all this.

Posted in Abject | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Across the Great Divide


cc licensed ( BY NC ND ) flickr photo shared by whittlz

I’m not the only person saddened by the passing of Levon Helm. The musical legacy is beyond praise. He also wrote what may be my favorite rock book everThis Wheel’s On Fire is jammed with amazing stories, sage words on music, and heaps of funny asides. Reading the intro more than a decade ago, I knew I was in good hands:

My story is recalled and written from my perspective on the drum stool, which I’ve always felt was the best seat in the house. From there you can see both the audience and the show. …So draw up a chair to my Catskill bluestone fireplace while I roll one, and we’ll crack open a couple of cold beers. The game’s on the cable with the sound off, and I’m gonna take you back in time specifically to cotton country: the Mississippi Delta just after World War II. We’re gonna get this damn show on the road.

One of the things we learn in the book is how much Levon hated the making of The Last Waltz… Among other things he accuses Robbie Robertson of using the film as a lever to cheat other members of The Band out of publishing royalties, not to mention presenting the guitarist as the leader of what was very much a collective. That account helps explain Levon’s surly demeanour throughout the movie, especially since he seems so gregarious and infectiously joyful almost everywhere else. So instead of a clip from the movie, how about this solo shot on SCTV? The jam that takes the song home captures both his unique drumming style and the fun he exuded while playing:

I wish the whole SCTV appearance was online, later on is a segment of him hanging out backstage, joking and telling stories…

I’ve blogged once before about Levon, remarking on how he managed to carve out a cool and innovative career model in the post-record company era. One of my great regrets will always be not making it to one of his Midnight Rambles. Being at one of these intimate gigs would have been a dream. Check out the smiles here.

Something about music, smiles and Levon Helm go together.

Posted in Video | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Crack the coursepack

Kudos to Crack the Coursepack, a resource on Canadian copyright that speaks directly and honestly to students. And not afraid to push the boundaries on polite debate.

I guess that’s why that even though it’s “created in the context of Prof. Tina Piper’s Intellectual & Industrial Property class at the McGill Faculty of Law”, it appears on a Tumblr site, not a university one.

Posted in Imagery | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

I’m a tangled mess of emotions. I don’t need your pity, damn you! Help me!


The Broken Spoke Bus for the Texas Top Hands Western Swing Band shared CC ( BY NC SD ) by Stuck in Customs

I’ve been whining for years about the frustrations inherent in trying to pull together the revolutionary promise of the syndication bus. So I was perversely heartened to read this (in my RSS reader, take that Scoble):

My feeds situation is a mess. I have this feed, and one for my worknotes, and one for my linkblog, and one for the podcast I do with Adam, and over time I’m sure there will be others.

If the godfather of RSS is struggling with aggregation, maybe I shouldn’t beat up on myself.

Then again, maybe that means Scoble is right. Maybe I should ditch this old school flava, and just get all my information from Twitter, accept the death of the open web, do all my publishing on Facebook, Google+, or whatever spying-for-free corporate platform that TechCrunch is investing in hyping today. I’m thinking of moving all my stuff to Pinterest. Chase the buzz!

Of course, if Scoble is not wrong, I don’t wanna be right. And I wonder… has Dave Winer seen the distributed dynamic wonder that is the ds106 Syndication Bus? Or Martha Burtis hopping up distributed comment aggregation? (And who knows, maybe some of that wicked Kickstarter scratch will find its way to FeedWordPress.) Or, for that matter, does Winer follow another RSS godfather, Stephen Downes, powering the Change11 MOOC with his homegrown (alright with me) engine gRSShopper?

Posted in Abject, Tech | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

The Moose is hunting for talent

Once again, the Northern Voice juggernaut is cranking into action. Canada’s first blogging social media conference is back for its seventh eighth(!) year. And [gasp], I’ve been lucky enough to have been one of the organizers the whole time. A catchphrase comes to mind…

A few significant changes this year. For the first time, we leave the warm embrace of UBC for the W2 Community Media Arts space in downtown Vancouver. W2 is a very dynamic location, and I think this less formal environment will add a welcome energy to the event. There are heaps of food and drink options nearby, so we won’t be catering lunches, which will hopefully mean we can drop our already cheap reg-fee (we’re still crunching the budget).

As ever, the conference is only as good as the people, so I hope the evidently gifted readership of this blog will consider adding some mojo to a session. You can offer proposals via our dead easy submission form. Deadline is April 1st — no fooling.  If you have a pet idea, a wild passion, an idea too crazy for any other conference, this is the event for you. And please forward this call to anyone you think would enjoy and add to the vibe.

And never forget, the Moose throws a kickin’ party… or so I’ve been told.

Posted in Abject | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fear and Exploitation on the Like/Retweet Web


shared CC by Esteban Cavrico

And thus too, it happened, perhaps, that before the last echoes of the last chime had utterly sunk into silence, there were many individuals in the crowd who had found leisure to become aware of the presence of a masked figure which had arrested the attention of no single individual before. And the rumour of this new presence having spread itself whisperingly around, there arose at length from the whole company a buzz, or murmur, expressive of disapprobation and surprise—then, finally, of terror, of horror, and of disgust. — Edgar Allan Poe, “The Masque of the Red Death”

I don’t know enough about the realities of Uganda and Africa to make a definitive #StopKony assessment, though I’ll point to pieces by Angelo Opi-Aiya Izama, Chris Blattman, Michael Wilkerson, Mareike Schomerus, Tim Allen, and Koen Vlassenroot. But I have followed the recent history of social media quite closely, and the first few minutes of the KONY 2012 video are so insipid they could have been written by Tom Friedman, or uttered by a certain kind of education conference keynoter: “we share what we love and it reminds us of what we ALL have in common”, “the game has new rules”… Those strike me as the most hackneyed, tired and discredited phrases imaginable, yet they must have power, given the popularity of the video, the millions made by selling “action kits”, the eBay hordes looking for a piece of the action.

And maybe it’s that rhetoric that connects #StopKony in my mind with another of this week’s social media imbroglios, the “human hotspot” hubbub at SXSW — in which homeless people have been employed as by-donation 4G wi-fi transmitters for conference attendees. Unlike the #StopKony affair, there is virtual unanimity in the condemnation of this “charitable experiment”. Dan Gillmor articulates the consensus view: “Nothing good… Sick.”

I am not prepared to offer a condemnation or defense of the stunt, at least until I have answers to a few questions. Such as, how much money are the homeless hotspots making? And what are the opportunities for the homeless in Austin, such as casual day work… and how do they compare? The men who have actually been asked how they feel seem OK with it. I also suspect that if some wireless provider had simply hired attractive eager clipboard kids at minimum wage, or sent unpaid student interns rewarded with a “networking opportunity” at SXSW nobody would object.

So why the vitriol? Bryan Alexander notes the language on the shirts, “I am a homeless hotspot”, which, in a common criticism, frames the participants as “helpless pieces of privilege-extending human infrastructure”. I see the point, but again, there are many humiliating jobs (leaving aside the ‘street papers’ most frequently cited for comparison) at the bottom of the economy in which someone serves as “privilege-extending human infrastructure”. Events like SXSW employ scores of these people directly and indirectly, they could not happen without them, and those jobs do not provide anything like a decent or dignified quality of life.

I have attended a conference in Austin (one of my favorite cities, I hope to go back), and like most North American cities you walk past many homeless people on your way to the conference venues, the networking lunches at the snazzy eateries, the bitchin’ parties in the hospitality suites and clubs. Had this stunt not occurred, I doubt these people would have appeared in the millions of breathless SXSW-related Tweets, Instagrams and blog posts that clog the web this week. If there are more tasteful initiatives at SXSW to help the homeless, I have not heard of them.

So again, why the vitriol? I suspect it is because the organizers of the stunt brought homelessness inside the event. SXSW is entrenched as the preeminent dealmaking opportunity and celebration of web culture, and particularly of start-up culture. SXSW is where dreams come true for internet entrepreneurs and others whose livelihoods involve chasing the next big thing.

Thing is, the dreams associated with startup.com culture are nothing new. Some entrepreneurs and investors have gotten fabulously rich. The boom-and-bust cycles have provided good gigs for a lot of programmers and new media douchebags. But I’ve been around a while, and for every “rock star” I’ve met there’ve been dozens of desperate strivers frantically networking and hoping to convince others that their expertise or vapour-ware service is worth an investment. They haven’t got a prayer, but they repeat the happy social media catechisms all the same (“we share what we love and it reminds us of what we ALL have in common”, “the game has new rules”). And over time, we have seen countless industries “disrupted”, millions thrown out of work, a few big winners and a lot of losers falling through an eroded post-austerity social safety net. The disruption is well underway in education. The game is about as fair and as honest as a Las Vegas casino.

I suspect that many SXSW attendees sense, if unconsciously, how the odds are stacked, how precarious the life of the party is… In Poe’s “The Masque of the Red Death” a plague ravages the land, while a fortunate few favoured by Prince Prospero revel behind protected walls: “There were buffoons, there were improvisatori, there were ballet-dancers, there were musicians, there was Beauty, there was wine. All these and security were within. Without was the ‘Red Death’.” The Prince throws a decadent masquerade, “much of the beautiful, much of the wanton, much of the bizarre, something of the terrible…” Yet one masked partygoer crosses the line, for he has dared to assume the guise of the Red Death itself. The Prince and his guests are outraged. Perhaps when the homeless were brought inside the walls of SXSW, literally decked out in the finery of the digital revolution, something similar was breached.

I started this post quoting Poe, I’ll go back there for the conclusion:

And now was acknowledged the presence of the Red Death. He had come like a thief in the night. And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. And the life of the ebony clock went out with that of the last of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all.

Posted in Abject | Tagged , , , , , , | 15 Comments

Everything Counts

OK, that last post is a little heavy, with a weekend impending I feel the need to toss in some gratuitous levity and wonder.

This has so many irresistible elements: groovy sounds, low-and-high-tech Rube Goldbergian cleverness, Latino cool, insanely cute kids. It’s also the first time I can recall liking the sounds of a recorder!

Viva DMK!

Via those fabulous McPhee girls, Keira and Danna.

Posted in Video | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Just follow the crumbs (journey into incredible open educational content architecture)

On those many occasions when petty discouragements threaten to send me into a tailspin of recrimination and despair, I turn to a remedy that nearly always sets me right. I merely have to glance at the “Recent Changes” index on the UBC Wiki to be surprised and heartened by how people at our university are exploiting MediaWiki for their own ends.

Yesterday I came across the following entry in the index:

http://wiki.ubc.ca/Science:Math_Exam_Resources/ Courses/MATH101/April_2011/Question_1_(f)/Solution_1

That is one long URL chain… clicking it displays a solution to a first year math problem that confirms I’ve forgotten everything I supposedly learned in a calculus class that I somehow passed twenty years ago:

I see via the navigational breadcrumbs at the top of the entry that this solution is linked to Question 1 (f), clicking that I see:

The question is posted, along with a hint and a solution cleverly hidden in expandable boxes that can quickly reveal them. On the right hand sidebar (not visible in the screenshot) is a box indicating that the question, hint and solution have been reviewed and approved, as well as an index to other questions, exams and courses. Looking at the MediaWiki source for this entry, you can see that almost no content has been specifically created for this entry. Almost all of it has been transcluded and inserted from other content bits on the wiki via templates.


I climb the next rung on the breadcrumb ladder, to see that this question is part of the page MATH101/April 2011:

Where I can see that among other things there is a PDF of the original exam, and list of wiki pages with questions/hints/solutions that is dynamically generated below. The dynamic list is generated by precise construction of the wiki URL, and this whole page structure is highly dependent on MediaWiki templates… So the tool that both creates the proper page URL and also pre-inserts the necessary templates is useful, and probably necessary:

The next step up the ladder takes us to the Math Exam portal page for Math 101, which suggests that there will eventually be a set of these resources dating back to exams in 2005!

Finally, we can land at the Math Exam Resources home page, with resources for seven courses at present. We also see that resources will soon be collected and navigable by topic tags (!), as well as a pending section on study guides and tips.

Not only are all these resources eminently reusable and remixable to users of MediaWiki, they are embeddable in any decent HTML content management system, and can be assembled into all manner of nicely-formatted PDF’s (and given the level of granularity, highly customizable ones at that) with the Book Creator (sample here).

Now, the Math department at UBC features some true power users, so this represents a degree of complexity and sophistication that is unlikely to be replicated elsewhere. But it speaks to the power of the platform, and the open model, that this group is able to construct something this layered and powerful. Although I believe our amazing Wiki Gardener Will Engle has been consulting the Math group and answering queries, it’s been the users driving this innovation. And there are other, less elaborate approaches being developed by users in different disciplines… though one of the cool things we have noticed is that it seems that users are learning how to get the most out of the platform by observing, mimicking and adapting each other’s work.

Seeing how flexible and powerful MediaWiki can be, and reading the many posts by the likes of Tony Hirst on how data on this platform can be manipulated and remixed, I also wonder if there are untapped dimensions of MediaWiki as an open data engine…

Posted in Tech | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Frustrating misconceptions on openness


cc licensed ( BY NC SD ) flickr photo shared by Bob.Fornal

If you have been following the Canadian higher education scene, you know that when it comes to copyright policy these are highly charged and troubling times. A recent development has two prominent Ontario institutions making the surprise decision to cut a controversial deal with a Canadian copyright collective. One may feel that the deal represents a capitulation, or have concerns about the process… one may see it as a good faith agreement that respects the rights of creators. I’ll leave that issue aside right now.

For the moment, I want to focus on a couple of statements that were allegedly made by upper administration at the University of Toronto Governing Council Meeting on February 16 – these quotes are drawn from the notes of Howard Knopf, so they may not be exact.

Provost Cheryl Misak is reported to have said “that the UofT was in favour of ‘open access’. However, she indicates that UofT is bound by a ‘statutory body’ called Access Copyright.” Knopf takes issue with the status of AC as a statutory body, but I am more concerned with the misuse of the term “open access”. The fact that there are works that are bound by copyright has no bearing on whether an institution chooses to support open access. This statement seems to suggest “we wish we could be open, but the law prevents it.” As of now, there is nothing anyone can do to prevent an institution sharing its research and teaching materials via open access — though corporate entities are lobbying for laws that might. (That last link via a very good post by Paul Stacey.)

Provost Misak is also reported to say “UofT would like to be like MIT and make as much available freely as possible, but in the meantime needs the AC indemnity to cover ‘missteps in the input’.” Knopf notes that the AC indemnity would not offer this protection. But again, I am more frustrated by the subtle conflation of sharing with legally risky behaviour, and even with infringement. One can easily encourage sharing of created works and exclude copyrighted third party materials. But can’t we use the problems associated with using proprietary materials as motivation to seriously support the adoption of works that encourage reuse? And isn’t infringement going to be less likely if we encourage activity to happen in the open?

Again, I am working off of another person’s notes, and I would be pleased to be informed that my concerns are unfounded. But it’s frustrating to see the problems caused by a broken existing model apparently used as justification to not pursue a viable alternative. We see this dynamic all over educational practice and policy, not just with copyright.

While I am at it, I need to vent about the single most common misconception about licensing that I encounter: the persistent belief that adopting a Creative Commons license means relinquishing copyright. Forgive the descent into flamer all-caps here, but CREATIVE COMMONS DOES NOT REPLACE COPYRIGHT. As noted on the CC FAQ, “CC licenses are copyright licenses, and depend on the existence of copyright to work. CC licenses are legal tools that creators and other rightsholders can use to offer certain usage rights to the public, while reserving other rights.” A Creative Commons license merely assists in clarifying the terms of reuse.

I don’t know exactly why the fear, uncertainty, and doubt around these fairly simple issues is so persistent, but until we can figure out a way to cut through the fog I don’t see a way forward.

Posted in Pointless | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments